Please feel free to contact myself directly if you have any further questions. However, your attention to this matter would be greatly appreciated. They were very professional and responsive to our concerns and are working hard to resolve this issue. We recently went to the Upland City Counsel and Mayor to address this issue. We have been very patient and tried to work thing out with the post office, we have been at the Upland Post Office over eighteen times with only empty promises, rudeness and the refusal of Post Master Gloria Collins to discuss solutions with us. And, how is it that when people go to pick up their mail, they are told they have no mail and then it is returned as undeliverable for federal monies. Instead, they abuse postal policy made to protect letter carriers for legitimate reasons however, it is unreasonable to think that 90 % of a carrier’s route has a dog problem until mail boxes are put out front. We where never asked if we would put mail boxes out front. Federal moneys for return of mail and mail boxes placed out front. They are blatant attempts to get what they want. Other reasons include the devaluation of the property and we refuse to be bullied by United States Postal Service who commits felonies.Ĭongressman Dreier, these problems are wide spread in Upland. She does have a care taker but leaves before three o’clock and mail arrives after that time. It would be very difficult for her to walk out with her walker to get mail everyday. First, we have a 90 year old tenant, Mary Watson who has been a resident in Unit B for the past 30 years. We have chosen not to place the mail boxes out front for a number of reasons. This has happened throughout the neighborhood as you see mail boxes are scattered with no uniformity or order and this devalues the neighborhood greatly. When there was a substitute mail carrier, the mail would be delivered and no problems with dogs were reported. These are problems which a 90 year old does not need. As a result of the returned mail as undeliverable, the resident in Unit B, Mary Watson had her gas turned off and is having problems with HUD. Often mail would be returned as undeliverable, when that was not the case. We were told that if the postal carrier heard a dog in a house she would refuse to deliver mail until the residents were forced to place their mail box by the sides walk away from the property even if they gave the dog away. This problem is extremely wide spread throughout this community as we contacted neighbors who experienced the same treatment. In the mean time, the residents would go to pick up mail and they were told they did not have any mail and if they spoke limited English they were given junk mail and laughed at. Unit A resident gave her Chihuahua away approximately three months ago and again completed appropriate paperwork to resume mail. Again mail delivery stopped and no one was notified as required by postal regulation under the Vicious Attack Dog Policy. This dog was kept inside the unit and no reasonable person could feel threatened by this small and delicate dog. Two weeks later, at 886 Sycamore Court Unit A, the resident of the unit had a mini Chihuahua which is half the size of a normal Chihuahua. Finally, after three more weeks and six visits to the post office, mail resumed. The owner of the dog gave his best friend away and he completed required paper work to resume mail service. The post office never gave noticed as required to anyone and the residents found out by inquiring to the post office. The postal carrier stopped delivering mail to all six units because we shared a common front fence. The resident of Unit B had a dog which was only out of the house when walked by his owner and never posed a threat to any one. These problems started with the property next to ours which is 876 Sycamore Court which has A, B and C units and between the two properties we share a common front fence. The Upland Post Office is in violation of these federal laws and should be investigated. This conduct is a violation of federal laws under Title Eighteen USC section 1703 - delay or destruction of mail, UCS Section 1700 - desertion of mail and, USC Section 1712 - falsification of postal return to increase compensation. We are writing to address issues of the Post Office’s refusal to deliver mail for a period of approximately 6 months. We are the owners of a triplex on 886 Sycamore Court units A, B, and C in Upland. My name is David Reed and my wife’s name is Marcela Reed.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |